Subject	Because it's using multi-disk, no need for large diameter. (n/m)
Posted by	sparkie on March 17, 2009 at 10:37 AM
	This message has been viewed 33 times.
In Reply To	Wow that's a tiny clutch assembly! (n/m) posted by collegeboy on March 16, 2009 at 11:21 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Hmm.. think this might be the problem? - 91Z32TT 20:08:39 03/16/09 that's one small clutch (n/m) - spyhunterTT(nj) 20:17:18 03/16/09 Yeppers, the ring gear is backwards. - LitlElvis 20:52:58 03/16/09 For a twin, it was fairly inexpensive @ $1300, flywheel - 91Z32TT 21:45:09 03/16/09 Glad you found the problem! (n/m) - ThunderZ 22:27:42 03/16/09 Me too! Thanks for taking a stab at the fix! (n/m) - 91Z32TT 22:32:31 03/16/09 dang (n/m) - aliaZ 22:36:52 03/16/09 Wow that's a tiny clutch assembly! (n/m) - collegeboy 23:21:40 03/16/09 Whole assembly w/flywheel weighs less than my RPS clutch :) (n/m) - 91Z32TT 00:40:56 03/17/09 Because it's using multi-disk, no need for large diameter. (n/m) - sparkie 10:37:04 03/17/09 I have the same prob but dont get what your talking about - Nis300owner 01:00:37 03/17/09 thinking clutchmasters installed the ring gear backwards (n/m) - gt300zxtt 01:31:49 03/17/09 Correct. The "groove" on the ring gear is facing the starter - 91Z32TT 02:10:54 03/17/09 Re: Correct. The "groove" on the ring gear is facing the starter - WazTTed 08:28:31 03/17/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.